12/24/2023 0 Comments Corrupted cityThere is a good reason here to go after City publicly, to be seen to regulate that issue. The financial muscle of nation-state clubs is a key argument employed in favour of a Super League, the Premier League’s only real commercial threat. The Premier League has been heavily criticised across Europe, accused of drowning the wider world in a wave of money. The weight of charges suggests this is more than simply being seen to act. Are these charges for real? Is the process fair or even necessary? And what might it ultimately mean? Ultimately, the Premier League has the power to impose fines, dock points and strip titles, even to relegate City (this, of course, will never happen: City are also wonderful content).īefore then there are three questions worth asking. If so then this is potentially a very serious matter. There is no time bar here and the league has been able to gather more evidence than a sheaf of Football Leaks printouts. It has to be assumed that the Premier League believes it has taken the initial step of meeting the two points where Uefa’s case fell down. We played the same rules as all the clubs in the Premier League and Uefa,’ said Pep Guardiola in 2020. To put it frankly, we could have an absolute crapshow on our hands. That judicial blade is once again cleaving the air. Two years on the Premier League has come to a similar conclusion. Albeit, with a fist-bump to Uefa’s lawyers, not a very good one. Or in other words, there was certainly enough to bring a case. But Cas also made a point of stating that Uefa’s charges were “not frivolous”. Other charges were “not established”, which means the weight of evidence was not sufficient. The guilty verdict was dismissed because the court of arbitration for sport (Cas) decided, on a 2-1 majority, that some of Uefa’s claims were time-barred, which is not quite the same as having them properly examined and dismissed. We played the same rules as all the clubs in the Premier League and Uefa,” Pep Guardiola said at the time, a rare step into the politics of ownership during his seven years as an employee. Little wonder City were so palpably furious at the process, the verdict and the degree of punishment handed down. Uefa’s two-year ban from the Champions League for perceived financial irregularities would have effectively derailed the entire Abu Dhabi project. City have already seen one guilty verdict overturned on the same issues, and will fight this case with the same vigour. Not that anyone should be getting too carried away. No word either from Dude Wipes, the club’s official male-oriented toilet paper partner, although who knows, all things considered this may well turn out to be a case for the dudes. No doubt news of the charges, which include allegations of inflated deals being struck with connected parties, will have sent shockwaves through City’s commercial sponsors jealous, as always, of their reputations.Īlthough to date there is no news of any swingeing statement from First Abu Dhabi Bank, Etihad Airways, Experience Abu Dhabi, Emirates Palace hotel in Abu Dhabi, Aldar Properties of Abu Dhabi, Masdar energy of Abu Dhabi, and e& telecoms of Abu Dhabi.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |